Yes No Share to Facebook
Definition of Conveyance Includes Motor Vehicles, Vessels, Aircraft, and Railroad Equipment
Question: What does "conveyance" mean under Canadian impaired driving laws?
Answer: In Canada, "conveyance" encompasses a range of vehicles including automobiles, boats, aircraft, and even bicycles, thereby making impaired operation laws applicable well beyond traditional driving. Understanding this broad definition can help you navigate potential legal challenges effectively.
Understanding the Meaning of Conveyance As Such Relates to Various Laws Involving Impairment By Alcohol or Drugs
The phrases driving under the influence ("dui") and driving while intoxicated ("dwi") are commonly used terms that are generally referred to as relating to drinking and driving; however, the relevant law is actually much broader and involves the operation of a conveyance which includes much more than just drinking and driving of an automobile. As explained below, a dui or dwi, can arise from conduct beyond what is understood as "driving". An appreciation for the legal definitions of key terms such as "operation" as well as "conveyance" is necessary to holding an accurate understanding of what may constitute as a dui or dwi charge.
The Law
As per the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, impaired operation of a conveyance is prescribed as an offence whereas it is stated:
Impaired operation
320.14 (1) Everyone commits an offence who
(a) operates a conveyance while the person’s ability to operate it is impaired to any degree by alcohol or a drug or by a combination of alcohol and a drug;
(b) subject to subsection (5), has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood alcohol concentration that is equal to or exceeds 80 mg of alcohol in 100 mL of blood;
(c) subject to subsection (6), has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood drug concentration that is equal to or exceeds the blood drug concentration for the drug that is prescribed by regulation; or
(d) subject to subsection (7), has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood alcohol concentration and a blood drug concentration that is equal to or exceeds the blood alcohol concentration and the blood drug concentration for the drug that are prescribed by regulation for instances where alcohol and that drug are combined.
Operation causing bodily harm
(2) Everyone commits an offence who commits an offence under subsection (1) and who, while operating the conveyance, causes bodily harm to another person.
Operation causing death
(3) Everyone commits an offence who commits an offence under subsection (1) and who, while operating the conveyance, causes the death of another person.
Definitions
320.11 The following definitions apply in this Part.
...
conveyance means a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment.
...
As stated within the Criminal Code, a conveyance means much more than just a car or truck as common automobiles whereas a conveyance is defined as to also include:
- A motor vehicle, such as a motorcycle, a moped, a snowmobile, an all terrain vehicle (ATV), etc.;
- A vessel, such as a boat (motorized or otherwise), a canoe, a raft, and perhaps even inflatables, etc.;
- An aircraft, such as an airplane, a helicopter, a hot air balloon, etc.; and
- A railway equipment item, such as a locomotive, a gondola that moves along tracks, etc.
In the case of R. v. Sillars, 2022 ONCA 510, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that a broad interpretation of conveyance, and in particular to the Sillars case, interpretation of a canoe as a vessel and therefore as a conveyance, should be taken. Upon reviewing the inclusion of a canoe as a vessel and thus a conveyance, it was said:
Statutory interpretation
[43] The words of an Act are to be interpreted in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act and the intention of Parliament. Section 12 of the Interpretation Act further provides that every enactment is deemed remedial and “shall be given such fair, large and liberal construction and interpretation as best ensures the attainment of its objects”. Statutory interpretation requires attention to text, context, and purpose.
[44] With respect to textual analysis, dictionaries can be a useful tool in statutory interpretation, but where – as here – a word might have narrower and broader meanings, a dictionary cannot resolve which meaning was intended by Parliament: Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 7th ed. (Markham: LexisNexis, 2022, at § 3.03.) While some dictionary definitions of “vessel” refer to size, others include any watercraft capable of transportation on water, and still others just say boat. For example, Merriam-Webster defines canoe as “a light narrow boat” and boat is “a small vessel for travel on water”.
[45] In determining whether Parliament intended a broader meaning of vessel that includes canoe, it is significant that the French version of s. 254(2) in effect uses the word for boat - “bateau”:
L’agent de la paix qui a des motifs raisonnables de soupçonner qu’une personne a dans son organisme de l’alcool ou de la drogue et que, dans les trois heures précédentes, elle a conduit un véhicule — véhicule à moteur, bateau, aéronef ou matériel ferroviaire … [Emphasis added.]
[46] It is uncontroversial that vessel and boat are synonymous in the context of s. 254(2). It is similarly uncontroversial that boat, in its ordinary meaning, carries no particular connotation of size, and that a canoe is a boat.
[47] The text of s. 254(2) thus suggests that canoe comes within the intended meaning of vessel. An analysis of the purpose or object of the enactment confirms this reading. The object of the enactment is to protect the public from the consequences of impaired operation of conveyances on the water. The scheme and object of the Act is clearly to address the public safety issue of impaired conveyances on the road and on the water. Impairment creates risks to passengers of a canoe, other watercraft, swimmers and first responders. Unlicensed conveyances, non-muscular-powered vessels and sailboats pose a risk of injury and death just as licensed and motor-powered conveyances do. The risks are not restricted to vessels that are required to be licensed.
Further indicia of legislative intent
[48] The appellant’s submissions ignore significant indicia of legislative intent in the legislative context.
[49] The word “vessel” is used several times in the legislation. There is no qualifier as there is where “vehicle” is qualified by “motor” (see e.g., ss. 253(1), 249(1) and 254(2)). Had the legislature sought to limit liability to exclude muscle-powered vessels or non-licensed conveyances, it would have done so. The legislation is remedial and is to be interpreted broadly.
[50] With respect to dangerous operation, the legislature included “water skis, surf-board, water sled or other towed object” in s. 249(1). Clearly, they are not motorized or licensed conveyances.
[51] There is no ambiguity left after considering these components. I conclude that a canoe is a vessel within the meaning of s. 254(2).
Interestingly, the Sillars case addressed an incident that occurred in April 2017 and thereby refers to now repealed sections of the Criminal Code; however, the relevance of the decision would surely remain applicable to the new equivalent sections of the Criminal Code.
Conclusion
The laws applying to drinking and driving of an automobile are actually much broader and apply to the operation of a conveyance rather than just the operation of an automobile. While a conveyance is defined so to include various motor vehicles such as motorcycles and snowmobiles, a conveyance is also defined so to include vessels such as boats whether motorized or otherwise as well as aircraft and also railway equipment.
